Breaking News
Home / Blog / Why Article 370 had to go ?

Why Article 370 had to go ?

We must not forget that the continuance of Article 370 is the biggest
hurdle to a lasting solution to the Kashmir conundrum.Twelve days after the
Pulwama suicide bombing that left nearly 40 CRPF jawans dead, India
retaliated. In the early morning hours of Tuesday, four Mirage 2000 fighter
jets took out terror outfit Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM)’s camps at Balakot,
Manshera, inside Pakistani territory. On the very next day, Omar Abdullah,
National Conference leader and former chief minister, gave an interview in
which he said, “Tinkering with Article 370 or 35A will be disastrous for
Jammu and Kashmir.” As if the timing wasn’t suspicious. But, then, what
else would Abdullah say? Why wouldn’t he try to save what is akin to a
hereditary “jagir” (fiefdom) of political heirs like him the Muftis?
Indeed, it is this opposition to the abrogation of Article 370 that
Muslim-dominated Kashmiri political parties share.

Unfortunately for them it is also what they have in common with separatists in the Valley. Actually, what Abdullah probably meant is that the repeal of this “Temporary,
Transitional and Special Provision” of the Indian Constitution would be
disastrous to his party. He might have added that it would also prove the
undoing of all other overt, quasi, or crypto separatists who have thrived all
these decades on Jammu and Kashmir’s “special status.” Resisting full
integration with the Indian Union, they have given a handle to Pakistan to
interfere, as also an excuse to Western powers to refer to the area as
India-occupied Kashmir. Who in the world dares call Tibet “China-
occupied”? Our own J&K, in comparison, acceded legally not by invasion or

A couple of years back, Jitendra Singh, Minister of State in the PMO
and MP from Udhampur, dared to wonder if Article 370 “actually worked to
J&K’s disadvantage.” Not only did Mehbooba Mufti condemn his statement,
but Omar Abdullah went on to tweet rather ominously, “Mark my words &
save this tweet – long after Modi Govt is a distant memory either J&K won’t
be part of India or Art 370 will still exist.” As if it is that flimsy provision that
keeps the state tied to India not the force of arms in the face of a relentless
an ongoing war waged by Pakistan. Isn’t it time to retort, “Yes, Mr.
Abdullah, we have marked your words but, sorry to say, you may actually
have to eat them.”

Not only is J&K a part of India, but the government has at last taken
steps to dilute if not challenge Article 370. On Thursday, the Cabinet
approved extending reservations for SCs and STs to J&K by amending the
“untouchable” Article 370. I called it “untouchable” because just last April,
the Supreme Court had said that it had come to acquire a “permanent
status.” This was quite in keeping with the October 2015 ruling of the J&K
High Court. In a 60-page judgement, Justices HasnainMasoodi and Janak
Raj Kotwal observed: “Article 370 though titled as ‘Temporary Provision’
and included in Para XXI titled ‘Temporary, Transitional and Special
Provisions’ has assumed a place of permanence in the Constitution. It is
beyond amendment, repeal or abrogation, in as much as Constituent
Assembly of the State before its dissolution did not recommend its
Amendment or repeal.”

But Finance Minister ArunJaitley explained that the proposed
Amendment would “serve the purpose of application of relevant provisions
of the Constitution of India, as amended through the Constitution (Seventy
Seventh Amendment) Act, 1995 and Constitution (One Hundred and Third
Amendment) Act, 2019 for Jammu and Kashmir, by issuing the Constitution
(Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Amendment Order, 2019 by the
President under clause (1) of Article 370.” Justifying this decision, he
added, “The Jammu and Kashmir Reservation (Amendment) Ordinance,
2019” would “give reservation benefits to the people living along the
International Border in Jammu and Kashmir, who often face shelling from
across the border.” The ordinance is to be promulgated by the President.
Kashmir was one of Jawaharlal Nehru’s Himalayan blunders; an
integral part of that blunder was Article 370. Over the years it has proved to
be practically useless to the people of J&K, keeping them underdeveloped,
cut off from the national mainstream, and vulnerable to cross-border
intrusions. Whatever its legal or historical status, the time has come to
amend, if not end Article 370.

We must not forget that the continuance of Article 370 is the biggest
hurdle to a lasting solution to the Kashmir conundrum. As such, it is the
other side of the Pulwama massacre. Strikes across the border are only
one way to avenge or redress the latter. But the internal rectification
required is the full and complete integration of Jammu and Kashmir with the
rest of India. In order to accomplish this, Article 370 must go.

Check Also

Individual Responsibility of Muslims

The search for justice is one of the continuing quests of humankind. It is the …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *